Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea PIPAvsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data

See exactly how South Korea PIPA controls map to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea PIPA maps to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data with 41% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 South Korea PIPA controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in South Korea PIPA: Data Collection & Consent.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

South Korea PIPA: Data Subject Rights(10 mappings)

PIPA-06Right of access to personal data3 targets
DO-DPL-02Consent management and withdrawal
DO-DPL-04Purpose limitation and specification
DO-DPL-05Data minimization requirements
PIPA-07Right to rectification of inaccurate data3 targets
DO-DPL-02Consent management and withdrawal
DO-DPL-04Purpose limitation and specification
DO-DPL-05Data minimization requirements
PIPA-09Right to data portability4 targets
DO-DPL-02Consent management and withdrawal
DO-DPL-04Purpose limitation and specification
DO-DPL-05Data minimization requirements
DO-DPL-09Right to data portability

South Korea PIPA: Data Security(6 mappings)

PIPA-15Access control for personal data
DO-DPL-15Access control for personal data
PIPA-16Data breach notification requirements2 targets
DO-DPL-16Data breach notification requirements
DO-DPL-17Security incident response procedures
PIPA-17Security incident response procedures2 targets
DO-DPL-16Data breach notification requirements
DO-DPL-17Security incident response procedures
PIPA-18Regular security testing and assessment
DO-DPL-18Regular security testing and assessment

South Korea PIPA: Data Governance(4 mappings)

PIPA-19Data protection officer designation3 targets
DO-DPL-19Data protection officer designation
DO-DPL-21Data protection impact assessments
DO-DPL-22Privacy by design and default
PIPA-20Records of processing activities
DO-DPL-19Data protection officer designation

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea PIPA and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

South Korea PIPA has 29 controls across its framework, while Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in South Korea PIPA: Data Collection & Consent, where 5 South Korea PIPA controls have no direct Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea PIPA and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

Of 29 total South Korea PIPA controls, 12 map directly to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea PIPA to Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

17 South Korea PIPA controls have no direct equivalent in Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data. The highest concentration of gaps is in South Korea PIPA: Data Collection & Consent with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea PIPA and Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data?

The domain with the highest gap count is South Korea PIPA: Data Collection & Consent (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.