Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea PIPAvsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)

See exactly how South Korea PIPA controls map to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea PIPA maps to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 South Korea PIPA controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Korea PIPA - Breach Notification - Article 34 - 72 Hour - Insurance Reserves - Article 39-3 - Damages - Civil Liability.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Korea PIPA - CPO - Privacy Officer - PIA - Personal Information Impact Assessment - ISMS-P Certification - Articles 31-33(3 mappings)

PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-333 targets
AL-DPA-14Direct Marketing
AL-DPA-17Breach Handling
AL-DPA-7Right of Access

Korea PIPA - Cross-Border Transfer - Articles 28-8 - 28-9 - Adequacy - EU 2021 - SCCs - ISMS-P Certification(2 mappings)

PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 20212 targets
AL-DPA-14Direct Marketing
AL-DPA-7Right of Access

Korea PIPA - Data Subject Rights - Access - Correction - Erasure - Suspension - Portability - Automated Decisions - Articles 35-37-2(3 mappings)

PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-373 targets
AL-DPA-1Scope and Definitions
AL-DPA-12International Data Transfers
AL-DPA-3Lawful Basis for Processing

Korea PIPA - Pseudonymisation - Article 28-2 - Enforcement - PIPC Investigation - Surcharges 3% - Article 64-2(2 mappings)

PIPA-Pseudonymisation-Article-28-2-3-Enforcement-PIPC-Investigation-Surcharges-3-Percent-Revenue-Article64-2Korea PIPA Pseudonymisation + Article 28-2 + Enforcement + PIPC + Surcharges 3% + Article 63 + 64-22 targets
AL-DPA-12International Data Transfers
AL-DPA-7Right of Access

Related Comparisons

Other South Korea PIPA comparisons

Other Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea PIPA and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?

South Korea PIPA has 8 controls across its framework, while Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Korea PIPA - Breach Notification - Article 34 - 72 Hour - Insurance Reserves - Article 39-3 - Damages - Civil Liability, where 1 South Korea PIPA controls have no direct Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea PIPA and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?

Of 8 total South Korea PIPA controls, 4 map directly to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea PIPA to Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?

4 South Korea PIPA controls have no direct equivalent in Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014). The highest concentration of gaps is in Korea PIPA - Breach Notification - Article 34 - 72 Hour - Insurance Reserves - Article 39-3 - Damages - Civil Liability with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea PIPA and Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Korea PIPA - Breach Notification - Article 34 - 72 Hour - Insurance Reserves - Article 39-3 - Damages - Civil Liability (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.