TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management ExaminationvsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 62% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Trust Services Criteria — Availability(1 mappings)

SOC-CY-A2Disaster Recovery
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management

Trust Services Criteria — Confidentiality(3 mappings)

SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection3 targets
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

Description Criteria — Nature of Business and Operations(3 mappings)

SOC-CY-DC1Nature of Business and Operations
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
SOC-CY-DC2Nature of Sensitive Information
→MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
SOC-CY-DC3Cybersecurity Risk Management Objectives
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management

Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Risk Governance(4 mappings)

SOC-CY-DC4Governance Structure
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
SOC-CY-DC5Risk Assessment Process3 targets
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
→NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud

Trust Services Criteria — Security(8 mappings)

SOC-CY-S1Logical and Physical Access Controls4 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
→MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
→PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
SOC-CY-S2System Operations3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
SOC-CY-S3Change Management
→NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management

Related Comparisons

Other SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination comparisons

SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)11 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs CSA CCM v411 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange11 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management10 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)10 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges10 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity10 mappingsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security10 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination has 16 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Controls, where 3 SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 16 total SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls, 10 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

6 SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Controls with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Controls (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.