Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management ExaminationvsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges

See exactly how SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls map to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination maps to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges with 62% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Trust Services Criteria — Availability(1 mappings)

SOC-CY-A2Disaster Recovery
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management

Trust Services Criteria — Confidentiality(3 mappings)

SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection3 targets
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls

Description Criteria — Nature of Business and Operations(3 mappings)

SOC-CY-DC1Nature of Business and Operations
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
SOC-CY-DC2Nature of Sensitive Information
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
SOC-CY-DC3Cybersecurity Risk Management Objectives
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management

Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Risk Governance(4 mappings)

SOC-CY-DC4Governance Structure
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
SOC-CY-DC5Risk Assessment Process3 targets
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud

Trust Services Criteria — Security(8 mappings)

SOC-CY-S1Logical and Physical Access Controls4 targets
CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection
PAS1192-5-SC-01Technical Controls
SOC-CY-S2System Operations3 targets
CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
SOC-CY-S3Change Management
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management

Related Comparisons

Other SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination comparisons

Other MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination has 16 controls across its framework, while MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Controls, where 3 SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls have no direct MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

Of 16 total SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls, 10 map directly to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination to MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

6 SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls have no direct equivalent in MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges. The highest concentration of gaps is in Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Controls with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination and MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges?

The domain with the highest gap count is Description Criteria — Cybersecurity Controls (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.