Cross-Framework Mapping

SOC 2vsRhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)

See exactly how SOC 2 controls map to Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SOC 2 maps to Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) with 13% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 SOC 2 controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CC - Common Criteria (Security).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

A - Availability(2 mappings)

SOC2-A1.2Environmental protections, data backups, and recovery infrastructure support availability
s.6(1)Right to Deletion
SOC2-A1.3Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
s.6(1)Right to Deletion

CC - Common Criteria (Security)(6 mappings)

SOC2-CC4.2COSO principle 17: Evaluates and communicates deficiencies in a timely manner3 targets
FDBR-702Definitions (§501.702)
RIDTPPA-1Definitions
WDPA-1Definitions
SOC2-CC7.4Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures3 targets
FDBR-702Definitions (§501.702)
RIDTPPA-1Definitions
WDPA-1Definitions

P - Privacy(12 mappings)

SOC2-P3.1Personal information is collected consistent with privacy commitments4 targets
CPA-CR-1Right to Access
CPA-CR-2Right to Correction
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability
RIDTPPA-11Data Minimisation and Purpose Limitation
SOC2-P4.3Personal information is securely disposed of4 targets
CPA-CR-1Right to Access
CPA-CR-2Right to Correction
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability
RIDTPPA-11Data Minimisation and Purpose Limitation
SOC2-P6.1Personal information is disclosed to third parties only as committed4 targets
CPA-CR-1Right to Access
CPA-CR-2Right to Correction
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability
RIDTPPA-11Data Minimisation and Purpose Limitation

Related Comparisons

Other SOC 2 comparisons

Other Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SOC 2 and Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)?

SOC 2 has 54 controls across its framework, while Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) covers 55 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CC - Common Criteria (Security), where 29 SOC 2 controls have no direct Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) equivalent.

How many controls map between SOC 2 and Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)?

Of 54 total SOC 2 controls, 7 map directly to Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SOC 2 to Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)?

47 SOC 2 controls have no direct equivalent in Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA). The highest concentration of gaps is in CC - Common Criteria (Security) with 29 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SOC 2 and Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is CC - Common Criteria (Security) (29 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.