TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SLSAvsISO 27017

See exactly how SLSA controls map to ISO 27017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SLSA maps to ISO 27017 with 75% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 4 SLSA controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Verification.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 4 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Build Integrity(4 mappings)

SUPCHAIN-1Build Integrity - Source, Build, Provenance4 targets
→ISO27017-01Shared responsibility model definition
→ISO27017-06Cloud identity management
→ISO27017-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→ISO27017-11Data classification for cloud

Source Integrity(5 mappings)

SUPCHAIN-2Source Integrity - Branch Protection, Code Review, Two-Person Rule5 targets
→ISO27017-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→ISO27017-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
→ISO27017-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→ISO27017-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→ISO27017-23Cloud vulnerability management

Dependencies(1 mappings)

SUPCHAIN-3Dependency Verification and SBOM
→ISO27017-16Virtual network segmentation

Related Comparisons

Other SLSA comparisons

SLSA vs NIST SP 800-1903 mappingsSLSA vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements3 mappingsSLSA vs TSA Pipeline Cybersecurity Directives3 mappingsSLSA vs ISO/SAE 214343 mappingsSLSA vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices3 mappingsSLSA vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook3 mappingsSLSA vs ISO 270183 mappingsSLSA vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents3 mappings

Other ISO 27017 comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO 2701721 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701721 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701721 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsISO 27018 vs ISO 2701721 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SLSA and ISO 27017?

SLSA has 4 controls across its framework, while ISO 27017 covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Verification, where 1 SLSA controls have no direct ISO 27017 equivalent.

How many controls map between SLSA and ISO 27017?

Of 4 total SLSA controls, 3 map directly to ISO 27017 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SLSA to ISO 27017?

1 SLSA controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Verification with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SLSA and ISO 27017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Verification (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.