TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SIG (Shared Assessments)vsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how SIG (Shared Assessments) controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SIG (Shared Assessments) maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance(1 mappings)

SHAREASSESS-1Information Governance and Risk
→AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition

Access Control(4 mappings)

SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication4 targets
→AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
→AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud

Technical Security(1 mappings)

SHAREASSESS-3Network Security, Endpoint, Data Protection
→AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Vulnerability and AppSec(4 mappings)

SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security4 targets
→AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation
→AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management

Related Comparisons

Other SIG (Shared Assessments) comparisons

SIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO 270434 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO/IEC 27010:20154 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)4 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO/SAE 214344 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices4 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20244 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.04 mappings

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappingsISO 27017 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SIG (Shared Assessments) and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

SIG (Shared Assessments) has 8 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud, where 1 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between SIG (Shared Assessments) and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 8 total SIG (Shared Assessments) controls, 4 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SIG (Shared Assessments) to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

4 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SIG (Shared Assessments) and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.