TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal ProductsvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 67% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 9 PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Self Inspection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 9 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Pharmaceutical Quality System(3 mappings)

PICSGMP-1Chapter 1: Pharmaceutical Quality System (PQS) and Quality Risk Management3 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

Personnel(3 mappings)

PICSGMP-2Chapter 2: Personnel - Qualified Personnel, Key Responsibilities, Training3 targets
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Premises and Equipment(3 mappings)

PICSGMP-3Chapter 3: Premises and Equipment - Design, Qualification, Calibration3 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
→3.4Enforce Data Retention

Documentation(4 mappings)

PICSGMP-4Chapter 4: Documentation - System, Record-Keeping, Data Integrity4 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
→3.3.1SAD is not stored after authorization, even if encrypted. All sensitive authentication data received is rendered unrecoverable upon completion of the authorization process
→3.4Enforce Data Retention

Production(3 mappings)

PICSGMP-5Chapter 5: Production Operations and Material Management3 targets
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Outsourced Activities(4 mappings)

PICSGMP-7Chapter 7: Outsourced Activities and Supplier Management4 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls your existing PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products into NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements into PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 67% in the header counts how many PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products comparisons

PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs ISO/IEC 27003:20177 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs SWIFT CSCF6 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence6 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration6 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes6 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 96 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)5 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs SQF Code Edition 9 - Safe Quality Food5 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products has 9 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Self Inspection, where 1 PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 9 total PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, representing 67% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

3 PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Self Inspection with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Self Inspection (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.