Cross-Framework Mapping

Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173)vsSection 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised)

See exactly how Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls map to Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) maps to Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised) with 8% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Controller/Processor Obligations and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Rights of Data Subjects(1 mappings)

PH-DPA-RS-04Right to Damages and Data Portability
508-502Interoperability with Assistive Technology

Related Comparisons

Other Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) comparisons

Other Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised)?

Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) has 13 controls across its framework, while Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Controller/Processor Obligations and Enforcement, where 5 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls have no direct Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised) equivalent.

How many controls map between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised)?

Of 13 total Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls, 1 map directly to Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) to Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised)?

12 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls have no direct equivalent in Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised). The highest concentration of gaps is in Controller/Processor Obligations and Enforcement with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and Section 508 — ICT Accessibility (Revised)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Controller/Processor Obligations and Enforcement (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.