Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173)vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0
See exactly how Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 54% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Rights of Data Subjects.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Controller/Processor Obligations and Enforcement(10 mappings)
Data Processing Principles and Requirements(2 mappings)
Rights of Data Subjects(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) has 13 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (54% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Rights of Data Subjects, where 3 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
Of 13 total Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls, 7 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 54% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
6 Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Rights of Data Subjects with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Philippines Data Privacy Act (RA 10173) and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is Rights of Data Subjects (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.