Cross-Framework Mapping

Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)vsISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary

See exactly how Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls map to ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) maps to ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary with 17% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 6 Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Liaison and Incident Response.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 6 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Cybercrime Offences(3 mappings)

PHILCC-1Computer Crime Offences (Illegal Access, Interference, Misuse of Devices)3 targets
ISO-22739-3.4.2Tokenization
ISO-22739-3.4.3Digital asset
ISO-22739-3.4.4Interoperability
Coverage crosswalk

A Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) to ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary controls your existing Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) into ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary into Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) to ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 17% in the header counts how many Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons

Other ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) and ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary?

Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) has 6 controls across its framework, while ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Liaison and Incident Response, where 1 Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls have no direct ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary equivalent.

How many controls map between Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) and ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary?

Of 6 total Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls, 1 map directly to ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary controls, representing 17% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) to ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary?

5 Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary. The highest concentration of gaps is in Liaison and Incident Response with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) and ISO 22739:2024 - Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies Vocabulary?

The domain with the highest gap count is Liaison and Incident Response (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.