Cross-Framework Mapping

Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven)vsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia)

See exactly how Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) controls map to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) maps to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in High-Risk Processing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Individual Rights(1 mappings)

NORWAY-2Data Subject Rights and Automated Decision-Making
AUPRV-5APP 12-13 Access and Correction of Personal Information

Accountability(3 mappings)

NORWAY-4DPIA, Privacy by Design, Records of Processing3 targets
AUPRV-1APP 1 Open and Transparent Management + Privacy Management Framework
AUPRV-6Sensitive Information, PIA, Privacy by Design, Children
AUPRV-8OAIC Cooperation, Vendor Management, Training, Complaints, Enforcement

Security(2 mappings)

NORWAY-5Security of Processing, Encryption, Pseudonymization, Access Control2 targets
AUPRV-4APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information
AUPRV-7Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response

Transfer and Processor Management(1 mappings)

NORWAY-6International Transfers and Processor Agreements
AUPRV-3APP 6-9 Use/Disclosure, Direct Marketing, Cross-Border, Government Identifiers

Governance and Lifecycle(3 mappings)

NORWAY-7DPO, Cooperation with Datatilsynet, Retention, Marketing, Training3 targets
AUPRV-1APP 1 Open and Transparent Management + Privacy Management Framework
AUPRV-6Sensitive Information, PIA, Privacy by Design, Children
AUPRV-8OAIC Cooperation, Vendor Management, Training, Complaints, Enforcement

Breach and Enforcement(2 mappings)

NORWAY-8Breach Notification, Complaints, Compliance, Enforcement2 targets
AUPRV-4APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information
AUPRV-7Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) has 8 controls across its framework, while Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in High-Risk Processing, where 1 Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) controls have no direct Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Of 8 total Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) controls, 6 map directly to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

2 Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) controls have no direct equivalent in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in High-Risk Processing with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is High-Risk Processing (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.