PCI SSFvsMAS TRM
See exactly how PCI SSF controls map to MAS TRM. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
PCI SSF maps to MAS TRM with 64% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 PCI SSF controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
PCI SSF: Information Security Governance(4 mappings)
PCI SSF: Cybersecurity Controls(5 mappings)
PCI SSF: Operational Resilience(11 mappings)
+15 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other PCI SSF comparisons
Other MAS TRM comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between PCI SSF and MAS TRM?
PCI SSF has 25 controls across its framework, while MAS TRM covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance, where 3 PCI SSF controls have no direct MAS TRM equivalent.
How many controls map between PCI SSF and MAS TRM?
Of 25 total PCI SSF controls, 16 map directly to MAS TRM controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCI SSF to MAS TRM?
9 PCI SSF controls have no direct equivalent in MAS TRM. The highest concentration of gaps is in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between PCI SSF and MAS TRM?
The domain with the highest gap count is PCI SSF: Information Security Governance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.