Cross-Framework Mapping

PCI SSFvsGLBA

See exactly how PCI SSF controls map to GLBA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

35
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
64%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PCI SSF maps to GLBA with 64% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 PCI SSF controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

PCI SSF: Information Security Governance(4 mappings)

PCI-SSF-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk3 targets
GLBA-16Due diligence and onboarding
GLBA-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
GLBA-19Concentration risk management
PCI-SSF-05Roles and responsibilities definition
GLBA-05Roles and responsibilities definition

PCI SSF: Cybersecurity Controls(5 mappings)

PCI-SSF-06Network security and segmentation
GLBA-06Network security and segmentation
PCI-SSF-07Endpoint protection and detection
GLBA-07Endpoint protection and detection
PCI-SSF-08Application security controls
GLBA-08Application security controls
PCI-SSF-09Encryption and key management
GLBA-09Encryption and key management
PCI-SSF-10Secure configuration standards
GLBA-10Secure configuration standards

PCI SSF: Operational Resilience(11 mappings)

PCI-SSF-11Business continuity planning and testing2 targets
GLBA-11Business continuity planning and testing
GLBA-12Disaster recovery procedures
PCI-SSF-12Disaster recovery procedures3 targets
GLBA-11Business continuity planning and testing
GLBA-12Disaster recovery procedures
GLBA-15Communication and escalation procedures
PCI-SSF-14Critical service identification3 targets
GLBA-11Business continuity planning and testing
GLBA-12Disaster recovery procedures
GLBA-15Communication and escalation procedures
PCI-SSF-15Communication and escalation procedures3 targets
GLBA-11Business continuity planning and testing
GLBA-12Disaster recovery procedures
GLBA-15Communication and escalation procedures

+15 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between PCI SSF and GLBA?

PCI SSF has 25 controls across its framework, while GLBA covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance, where 3 PCI SSF controls have no direct GLBA equivalent.

How many controls map between PCI SSF and GLBA?

Of 25 total PCI SSF controls, 16 map directly to GLBA controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCI SSF to GLBA?

9 PCI SSF controls have no direct equivalent in GLBA. The highest concentration of gaps is in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PCI SSF and GLBA?

The domain with the highest gap count is PCI SSF: Information Security Governance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.