TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

PCI P2PEvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how PCI P2PE controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
10
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PCI P2PE maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 27% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 PCI P2PE controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

PCI P2PE: Information Security Governance(2 mappings)

PCI-P2PE-05Roles and responsibilities definition2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

PCI P2PE: Cybersecurity Controls(2 mappings)

PCI-P2PE-08Application security controls
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-06Secure software development practices are integrated throughout the SDLC
PCI-P2PE-10Secure configuration standards
→NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied

PCI P2PE: Operational Resilience(12 mappings)

PCI-P2PE-11Business continuity planning and testing3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
PCI-P2PE-12Disaster recovery procedures6 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06End-of-recovery is declared based on criteria and documentation
→NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05Criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
PCI-P2PE-14Critical service identification3 targets
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-03Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
→NIST-CSF-PR.IR-04Adequate resource capacity to ensure availability is maintained

PCI P2PE: Third-Party Risk Management(4 mappings)

PCI-P2PE-16Due diligence and onboarding3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
PCI-P2PE-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other PCI P2PE comparisons

PCI P2PE vs PSD2 SCA15 mappingsPCI P2PE vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook15 mappingsPCI P2PE vs APRA CPS 23415 mappingsPCI P2PE vs PCI PIN Security15 mappingsPCI P2PE vs PCI SSF15 mappingsPCI P2PE vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)12 mappingsPCI P2PE vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents10 mappingsPCI P2PE vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between PCI P2PE and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

PCI P2PE has 44 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Key Management, where 5 PCI P2PE controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between PCI P2PE and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 44 total PCI P2PE controls, 12 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCI P2PE to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

32 PCI P2PE controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Key Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PCI P2PE and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Key Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.