PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built EnvironmentsvsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management
See exactly how PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls map to Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments maps to Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management with 58% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Security Controls(20 mappings)
+21 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons
Other Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management?
PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments has 24 controls across its framework, while Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 7 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls have no direct Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management equivalent.
How many controls map between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management?
Of 24 total PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls, 14 map directly to Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments to Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management?
10 PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls have no direct equivalent in Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments and Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management?
The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.