TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016)vsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)

See exactly how Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
56%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 56% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cybersecurity Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Cybersecurity Governance(20 mappings)

FAA-CS-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight3 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment2 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management4 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-25Outsourcing of ICT Services
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-02Organizational Structure and Accountability
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework6 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
PNG-CC-CG-02NICTA Oversight2 targets
→TSSR-INFO-2Stored Communications Security
→TSSR-INFO-3Lawful Interception Capability
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) comparisons

Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)10 mappingsPapua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)10 mappingsPapua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202410 mappingsPapua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) vs NIS2 Directive (Directive (EU) 2022/2555)10 mappingsPapua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) vs FTC Health Breach Notification Rule9 mappingsPapua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)9 mappingsPapua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange9 mappingsPapua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) vs Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR)9 mappings

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) has 16 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cybersecurity Governance, where 7 Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Of 16 total Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) controls, 9 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

7 Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cybersecurity Governance with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Papua New Guinea National Cybersecurity Policy & Cybercrime Act (2016) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cybersecurity Governance (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.