Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019)vsChina Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)
See exactly how Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) controls map to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) maps to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) with 38% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter IV - Obligations of Data Controllers.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 52 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter IV - Obligations of Data Controllers(19 mappings)
Chapter III - ARCOP Rights(1 mappings)
+32 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) comparisons
Other China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) has 29 controls across its framework, while China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter IV - Obligations of Data Controllers, where 4 Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) controls have no direct China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) equivalent.
How many controls map between Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
Of 29 total Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) controls, 12 map directly to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
18 Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) controls have no direct equivalent in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter IV - Obligations of Data Controllers with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter IV - Obligations of Data Controllers (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.