Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal DatavsChina Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)
See exactly how Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data controls map to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data maps to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) with 35% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 58 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Chapter IV - Obligations of Data Controllers(19 mappings)
Chapter II - Conditions of Data Processing(1 mappings)
+38 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data comparisons
Other China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data has 31 controls across its framework, while China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects, where 10 Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) equivalent.
How many controls map between Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
Of 31 total Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data controls, 13 map directly to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
22 Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Côte d'Ivoire Law No. 2013-450 on the Protection of Personal Data and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter III - Rights of Data Subjects (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.