TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)vsSouth Korea PIPA

See exactly how OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls map to South Korea PIPA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
83%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) maps to South Korea PIPA with 83% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 6 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls identifies 1 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Gathering and Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 6 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Culture and Organization(3 mappings)

DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance3 targets
→PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33
→PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-37
→PIPA-Sensitive-Information-Unique-ID-Resident-Registration-Numbers-CCTV-Articles-23-24-25Korea PIPA Sensitive Information + Unique ID + RRN + CCTV + Articles 23-25

Implementation Practices(2 mappings)

DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling2 targets
→PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33
→PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-37

Build and Deployment(1 mappings)

DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
→PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 2021

Test and Verification(1 mappings)

DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing
→PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33

Metrics and Improvement(1 mappings)

DSOMM-6Metrics, Maturity Measurement, and Continuous Improvement
→PIPA-Pseudonymisation-Article-28-2-3-Enforcement-PIPC-Investigation-Surcharges-3-Percent-Revenue-Article64-2Korea PIPA Pseudonymisation + Article 28-2 + Enforcement + PIPC + Surcharges 3% + Article 63 + 64-2

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs ISMAP (Japan)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1466 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1456 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Liechtenstein DPA5 mappings

Other South Korea PIPA comparisons

Vietnam PDPD vs South Korea PIPA5 mappingsTurkey KVKK vs South Korea PIPA5 mappingsPrivacy Act 2020 vs South Korea PIPA5 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs South Korea PIPA5 mappingsPeru DPL vs South Korea PIPA5 mappingsPersonal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) vs South Korea PIPA5 mappingsPDPA Thailand vs South Korea PIPA5 mappingsPDPA Singapore vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and South Korea PIPA?

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) has 6 controls across its framework, while South Korea PIPA covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (83% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Gathering and Monitoring, where 1 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct South Korea PIPA equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and South Korea PIPA?

Of 6 total OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls, 5 map directly to South Korea PIPA controls — representing 83% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to South Korea PIPA?

1 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea PIPA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Gathering and Monitoring with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and South Korea PIPA?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Gathering and Monitoring (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.