Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)vsNIS2 Directive

See exactly how OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls map to NIS2 Directive. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) maps to NIS2 Directive with 67% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 6 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls identifies 52 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Testing and Verification.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 6 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Culture and Organization(2 mappings)

DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance2 targets
NIS2D-3Incident Reporting Obligations - Articles 23 and 30
NIS2D-8Cross-Border Coordination, ENISA, CSIRTs Network, and CER Coordination

Build and Deployment(3 mappings)

DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management3 targets
NIS2D-2Cybersecurity Risk Management Measures - Article 21
NIS2D-5Supply Chain Security - Article 21(2)(d) and 22
NIS2D-6Vulnerability Disclosure and CVD Programme - Article 12 and 21

Test and Verification(3 mappings)

DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing3 targets
NIS2D-2Cybersecurity Risk Management Measures - Article 21
NIS2D-5Supply Chain Security - Article 21(2)(d) and 22
NIS2D-6Vulnerability Disclosure and CVD Programme - Article 12 and 21

Information Gathering and Monitoring(1 mappings)

DSOMM-5Information Gathering, Logging, Monitoring, and Incident Response
NIS2D-2Cybersecurity Risk Management Measures - Article 21

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and NIS2 Directive?

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) has 6 controls across its framework, while NIS2 Directive covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Testing and Verification, where 7 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct NIS2 Directive equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and NIS2 Directive?

Of 6 total OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls, 3 map directly to NIS2 Directive controls — representing 67% coverage. The remaining 52 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to NIS2 Directive?

52 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct equivalent in NIS2 Directive. The highest concentration of gaps is in Testing and Verification with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and NIS2 Directive?

The domain with the highest gap count is Testing and Verification (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.