Open Banking SecurityvsISO/IEC 27007:2020
See exactly how Open Banking Security controls map to ISO/IEC 27007:2020. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Open Banking Security maps to ISO/IEC 27007:2020 with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Open Banking Security controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Logging + Reporting + SLA.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
SCA + Consent + UX(2 mappings)
TPP Onboarding(2 mappings)
Incident + BCM(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Open Banking Security comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27007:2020 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Open Banking Security and ISO/IEC 27007:2020?
Open Banking Security has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27007:2020 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Logging + Reporting + SLA, where 1 Open Banking Security controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27007:2020 equivalent.
How many controls map between Open Banking Security and ISO/IEC 27007:2020?
Of 8 total Open Banking Security controls, 3 map directly to ISO/IEC 27007:2020 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Open Banking Security to ISO/IEC 27007:2020?
5 Open Banking Security controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27007:2020. The highest concentration of gaps is in Logging + Reporting + SLA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Open Banking Security and ISO/IEC 27007:2020?
The domain with the highest gap count is Logging + Reporting + SLA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.