TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-88vsISO 27017

See exactly how NIST SP 800-88 controls map to ISO 27017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-88 maps to ISO 27017 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-88 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Third-Party Providers.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Policy, Roles, Decision Framework(5 mappings)

NISTSP88-1Media Sanitization Policy, Roles, and Decision Framework5 targets
→ISO27017-01Shared responsibility model definition
→ISO27017-06Cloud identity management
→ISO27017-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→ISO27017-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→ISO27017-11Data classification for cloud

Cryptographic Erase + Key Management(1 mappings)

NISTSP88-4Cryptographic Erase, Key Management, and Verification of Erase
→ISO27017-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Inventory, Tracking, Chain of Custody(1 mappings)

NISTSP88-5Media Inventory, Tracking, Chain of Custody, and Sanitization Records
→ISO27017-14Data backup and recovery in cloud

Verification + Audit + Training + Safety(2 mappings)

NISTSP88-7Verification, Audit, Training, and Environmental/Safety Controls2 targets
→ISO27017-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→ISO27017-23Cloud vulnerability management

Cloud and Hosted Storage Scope(1 mappings)

NISTSP88-8Cloud-Resident Data, Hosted Storage, and Scope Boundaries
→ISO27017-16Virtual network segmentation

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-88 comparisons

NIST SP 800-88 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar5 mappingsNIST SP 800-88 vs OWASP MASVS5 mappingsNIST SP 800-88 vs OWASP ASVS5 mappingsNIST SP 800-88 vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsNIST SP 800-88 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)5 mappingsNIST SP 800-88 vs NIST SP 800-1905 mappingsNIST SP 800-88 vs ISO/SAE 214345 mappingsNIST SP 800-88 vs ISO 270185 mappings

Other ISO 27017 comparisons

NIST SP 800-146 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO 2701721 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701721 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs ISO 2701721 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs ISO 2701721 mappingsISO 27018 vs ISO 2701721 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-88 and ISO 27017?

NIST SP 800-88 has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 27017 covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Third-Party Providers, where 1 NIST SP 800-88 controls have no direct ISO 27017 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-88 and ISO 27017?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-88 controls, 5 map directly to ISO 27017 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-88 to ISO 27017?

3 NIST SP 800-88 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Third-Party Providers with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-88 and ISO 27017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Third-Party Providers (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.