NIST SP 800-66vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)
See exactly how NIST SP 800-66 controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-66 maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-66 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration with NIST RMF, CSF, OCR Enforcement.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Security Management Process - Risk Analysis and Risk Management(1 mappings)
Workforce Security + Access + Training(3 mappings)
Physical Safeguards(2 mappings)
Technical Safeguards(7 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-66 comparisons
Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-66 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
NIST SP 800-66 has 8 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration with NIST RMF, CSF, OCR Enforcement, where 1 NIST SP 800-66 controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-66 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
Of 8 total NIST SP 800-66 controls, 4 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-66 to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
4 NIST SP 800-66 controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration with NIST RMF, CSF, OCR Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-66 and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Integration with NIST RMF, CSF, OCR Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.