TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsNIST SP 800-66

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to NIST SP 800-66. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to NIST SP 800-66 with 29% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(6 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit3 targets
→NISTSP66-2Workforce Security, Information Access Management, and Awareness Training
→NISTSP66-5Physical Safeguards: Facility Access, Workstation Use and Security, Device and Media Controls
→NISTSP66-6Technical Safeguards: Access Control, Audit Controls, Integrity, Person Authentication
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→NISTSP66-6Technical Safeguards: Access Control, Audit Controls, Integrity, Person Authentication
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→NISTSP66-6Technical Safeguards: Access Control, Audit Controls, Integrity, Person Authentication
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
→NISTSP66-6Technical Safeguards: Access Control, Audit Controls, Integrity, Person Authentication

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(2 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→NISTSP66-1Security Management Process: Risk Analysis and Risk Management for ePHI
3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→NISTSP66-6Technical Safeguards: Access Control, Audit Controls, Integrity, Person Authentication

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(2 mappings)

3.2.1Account data storage minimised
→NISTSP66-2Workforce Security, Information Access Management, and Awareness Training
3.9Encrypt Data on Removable Media
→NISTSP66-2Workforce Security, Information Access Management, and Awareness Training

Access Control and Identification(2 mappings)

3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
→NISTSP66-6Technical Safeguards: Access Control, Audit Controls, Integrity, Person Authentication
3.7.1Key generation procedures
→NISTSP66-6Technical Safeguards: Access Control, Audit Controls, Integrity, Person Authentication

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-66 comparisons

Turkey KVKK vs NIST SP 800-664 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs NIST SP 800-664 mappingsISO 13485 vs NIST SP 800-664 mappingsISO 27799 vs NIST SP 800-664 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-664 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs NIST SP 800-664 mappingsAnnex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems vs NIST SP 800-664 mappingsISO 27019 vs NIST SP 800-664 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-66?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-66 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 11 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct NIST SP 800-66 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-66?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 10 map directly to NIST SP 800-66 controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NIST SP 800-66?

25 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-66. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-66?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.