Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsNIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH with 14% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(5 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest2 targets
IR-2Incident Response and Recovery
RA-1Policy and Procedures
3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity2 targets
CA-8Penetration Testing
IR-4Incident Handling
3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
CA-9Internal System Connections

System Protection and Communications(2 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
CA-9Internal System Connections
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
CA-9Internal System Connections

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH covers 317 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 13 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 5 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH?

30 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.