TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsISO 22000

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to ISO 22000. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to ISO 22000 with 6% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(1 mappings)

3.1Physical Security
→ISO22000-15Corrective actions and lessons learned

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→ISO22000-02Hazard identification and risk assessment

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other ISO 22000 comparisons

ISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 2200020 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 2200013 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 2200013 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 2200013 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 2200011 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 2200011 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 2200011 mappingsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 2200011 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 22000?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 22000 covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 15 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct ISO 22000 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 22000?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 2 map directly to ISO 22000 controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to ISO 22000?

33 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22000. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ISO 22000?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.