TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsFBI CJIS Security Policy

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to FBI CJIS Security Policy. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

33
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
49%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to FBI CJIS Security Policy with 49% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(16 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection4 targets
→CJIS-14Physical Protection
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→CJIS-7Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→CJIS-7Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings2 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup2 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection2 targets
→CJIS-8Media Protection
→CJIS-9System and Communications Protection
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest2 targets
→CJIS-8Media Protection
→CJIS-9System and Communications Protection
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity2 targets
→CJIS-8Media Protection
→CJIS-9System and Communications Protection

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment
→CJIS-17Risk Assessment
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance2 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management

Incident Response and Media Protection(1 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition
→CJIS-19Supply Chain Risk Management

+13 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other FBI CJIS Security Policy comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FBI CJIS Security Policy18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FBI CJIS Security Policy17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while FBI CJIS Security Policy covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (49% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 7 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct FBI CJIS Security Policy equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 17 map directly to FBI CJIS Security Policy controls — representing 49% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to FBI CJIS Security Policy?

18 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in FBI CJIS Security Policy. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and FBI CJIS Security Policy?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.