Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 1800-32vsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how NIST SP 1800-32 controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

36
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 1800-32 maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 32% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 NIST SP 1800-32 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 359K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 36 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 359K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

NIST SP 1800-32: Asset Identification & Governance(1 mappings)

NIST1800-32-02System security categorization
ISO27001-A.5.12Data sensitivity classification scheme

NIST SP 1800-32: Access Management(6 mappings)

NIST1800-32-07Personnel risk assessment2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
NIST1800-32-08Electronic access perimeter management2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
NIST1800-32-09Interactive remote access security2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties

NIST SP 1800-32: Systems Security(5 mappings)

NIST1800-32-12Malware prevention for operational systems
ISO27001-A.8.7Malicious software defence
NIST1800-32-13Network security monitoring2 targets
ISO27001-A.7.4Physical Security Monitoring
ISO27001-A.7.4Physical Security Monitoring
NIST1800-32-14System security hardening2 targets
ISO27001-A.8.9Configuration Management
ISO27001-A.8.9Configuration Management

NIST SP 1800-32: Incident Response & Recovery(8 mappings)

NIST1800-32-18Reporting obligations to authorities4 targets
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
ISO27001-A.8.13Backup strategy and recovery assurance
NIST1800-32-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies4 targets
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
ISO27001-A.8.13Backup strategy and recovery assurance

+16 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 704 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (359K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 1800-32 and ISO 27001:2022?

NIST SP 1800-32 has 44 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect, where 6 NIST SP 1800-32 controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 1800-32 and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 44 total NIST SP 1800-32 controls, 14 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 1800-32 to ISO 27001:2022?

30 NIST SP 1800-32 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 1800-32 and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protect (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.