Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsUnion Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013

See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 with 15% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Manage.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Govern(4 mappings)

AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies2 targets
Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
NIST-AI600-GOV-1Legal and Regulatory Compliance2 targets
Art. 40Establishment and Composition
Art. 47Existing Legal Procedures

Map(8 mappings)

AIRMF-MAP-02AI Risk Identification2 targets
Art. 128Risk analysis for entry
Art. 264Risk analysis for exit
AIRMF-MAP-03AI Impact Assessment2 targets
Art. 128Risk analysis for entry
Art. 264Risk analysis for exit
NIST-AI600-MAP-1GAI Risk Identification2 targets
Art. 40Establishment and Composition
Art. 47Existing Legal Procedures
NIST-AI600-MAP-2Stakeholder Impact Assessment2 targets
Art. 128Risk analysis for entry
Art. 264Risk analysis for exit

Measure(4 mappings)

AIRMF-MEA-01AI Performance Metrics2 targets
Art. 41Exemptions from Certain GDPR Provisions
Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
NIST-AI600-MEA-3Privacy Leak Assessment2 targets
Art. 40Establishment and Composition
Art. 47Existing Legal Procedures

Related Comparisons

Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons

Other Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 715 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 52 controls across its framework, while Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Manage, where 13 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

Of 52 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 8 map directly to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

44 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013. The highest concentration of gaps is in Manage with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Union Customs Code (UCC) - Regulation (EU) No 952/2013?

The domain with the highest gap count is Manage (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.