NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsPanama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019)
See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) with 15% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 52 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Measure.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 52 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 415K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 415K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.
Govern(7 mappings)
Manage(3 mappings)
Map(3 mappings)
Measure(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Other Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 715 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (415K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019)?
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 52 controls across its framework, while Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Measure, where 12 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019)?
Of 52 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 8 map directly to Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019) controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019)?
44 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019). The highest concentration of gaps is in Measure with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and Panama Law on Personal Data Protection (Law No. 81 of 2019)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Measure (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.