TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)

See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) with 13% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Govern(1 mappings)

AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies
→CPS234.15Roles and Responsibilities

Manage(7 mappings)

AIRMF-MAN-03AI Incident Response4 targets
→CPS234.24Incident Response Mechanisms
→CPS234.25Incident Response Plans
→CPS234.26APRA Notification (72 Hours)
→CPS234.27Control Weakness Notification (10 Days)
NIST-AI600-MGT-4Incident Response for GAI3 targets
→CPS234.24Incident Response Mechanisms
→CPS234.25Incident Response Plans
→CPS234.26APRA Notification (72 Hours)

Measure(1 mappings)

AIRMF-MEA-01AI Performance Metrics
→CPS234.15Roles and Responsibilities

Related Comparisons

Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs EU Digital Markets Act14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202114 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappings

Other APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) comparisons

ISO/IEC 30111:2019 vs APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)5 mappingsC5 (Germany) vs APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)5 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)5 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)5 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)5 mappingsNIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile vs APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)5 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)5 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)?

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 31 controls across its framework, while APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Govern, where 8 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)?

Of 31 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 4 map directly to APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)?

27 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Govern with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Govern (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.