NIS2 Directive Implementing ActsvsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
See exactly how NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Sector-Specific.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Incident Response and Continuity(3 mappings)
Personnel and Cryptography(4 mappings)
Access and Assets(7 mappings)
Network and Monitoring(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?
NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Sector-Specific, where 1 NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?
Of 8 total NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?
4 NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Sector-Specific with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Sector-Specific (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.