Cross-Framework Mapping

Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity RequirementsvsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers

See exactly how Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls map to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements maps to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers with 42% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Incident Response and Reporting(18 mappings)

FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment2 targets
A.2Risk Assessment
CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment
FTC-314.4hWritten Incident Response Plan
B.5Vulnerability Management
FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting2 targets
A.2Risk Assessment
CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification2 targets
D.1Incident Response Planning
D.2Incident Reporting
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions2 targets
A.2Risk Assessment
CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan3 targets
D.1Incident Response Planning
D.2Incident Reporting
D.3Backup and Recovery
LLOYDS-IR-02Lloyd's Incident Reporting
B.5Vulnerability Management
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
D.3Backup and Recovery
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection2 targets
B.2Data Protection and Encryption
D.1Incident Response Planning
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan2 targets
D.1Incident Response Planning
D.2Incident Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements has 24 controls across its framework, while UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 6 Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers equivalent.

How many controls map between Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

Of 24 total Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls, 10 map directly to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

14 Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.