Cross-Framework Mapping

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)vsCOSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)

See exactly how NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls map to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
35
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) maps to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security Program.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Definitions and Scope(7 mappings)

MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery2 targets
RA-2Human Rights Risk Identification
RA-4Rule of Law Assessment
MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities2 targets
RA-2Human Rights Risk Identification
RA-4Rule of Law Assessment
NAIC-668-3Definitions3 targets
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment

Information Security Program(7 mappings)

NAIC-668-4AISP Implementation3 targets
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment
NAIC-ISP-02Risk Assessment3 targets
DMF-4.1Impact Assessment
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment
NAIC-ISP-03Security Measures
DMF-4.2Risk Categorization

Related Comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

Other COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 49 controls across its framework, while COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security Program, where 13 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) equivalent.

How many controls map between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

Of 49 total NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls, 6 map directly to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

43 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security Program with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security Program (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.