Cross-Framework Mapping

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management GuidelinesvsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW

See exactly how Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW with 12% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance and Framework - MAS TRM Chapters 2-3-5(1 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Governance-Chapters-2-3-Board-Senior-Management-Risk-Framework-Information-Asset-ManagementMAS TRM Governance + Chapters 2-3 + Board + Senior Management + Risk Framework + Information Asset Management
CA-9Internal System Connections

Related Comparisons

Other Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW covers 173 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15, where 1 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW equivalent.

How many controls map between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

Of 8 total Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls, 1 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

7 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW. The highest concentration of gaps is in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW?

The domain with the highest gap count is Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.