Cross-Framework Mapping

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management GuidelinesvsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)

See exactly how Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Online Authentication and Payment Card - MAS TRM Chapters 12-13.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cyber Resilience - MAS TRM Chapter 11(1 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Cyber-Resilience-Chapter-11-Threat-Intelligence-Penetration-Testing-Incident-Response-1-Hour-NotificationMAS TRM Cyber Resilience + Chapter 11 + Threat Intelligence + Penetration Testing + Incident Response + 1-Hour Notification
AIRMF-MAN-03AI Incident Response

Governance and Framework - MAS TRM Chapters 2-3-5(2 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Governance-Chapters-2-3-Board-Senior-Management-Risk-Framework-Information-Asset-ManagementMAS TRM Governance + Chapters 2-3 + Board + Senior Management + Risk Framework + Information Asset Management2 targets
AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies
AIRMF-MEA-01AI Performance Metrics

Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15(2 mappings)

MAS-TRM-Third-Party-IT-Audit-Chapters-14-15-Outsourcing-Notice-658-Concentration-Risk-Exit-StrategyMAS TRM Third Party + IT Audit + Chapters 14-15 + Outsourcing + Notice 658 + Concentration Risk + Exit Strategy2 targets
AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies
AIRMF-MAN-01AI Risk Treatment

Related Comparisons

Other Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines comparisons

Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Online Authentication and Payment Card - MAS TRM Chapters 12-13, where 1 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.

How many controls map between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

Of 8 total Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls, 3 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

5 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in Online Authentication and Payment Card - MAS TRM Chapters 12-13 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Online Authentication and Payment Card - MAS TRM Chapters 12-13 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.