Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management GuidelinesvsISO/IEC 27400:2022
See exactly how Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Access Control Cryptography Network - MAS TRM Chapters 9-10(6 mappings)
Cyber Resilience - MAS TRM Chapter 11(1 mappings)
Governance and Framework - MAS TRM Chapters 2-3-5(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15, where 1 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
Of 8 total Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls, 3 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
5 Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is Third Party Risk and IT Audit - MAS TRM Chapters 14-15 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.