Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)vsCOSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)
See exactly how Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls map to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) maps to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) with 14% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 58 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls identifies 50 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Reporting Obligations.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 58 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.
Definitions and Scope(10 mappings)
Reporting Obligations(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons
Other COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 769 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?
Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) has 58 controls across its framework, while COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Reporting Obligations, where 14 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls have no direct COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) equivalent.
How many controls map between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?
Of 58 total Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls, 8 map directly to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 50 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) to COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?
50 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013). The highest concentration of gaps is in Reporting Obligations with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and COSO Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Reporting Obligations (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.