TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy ActvsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

See exactly how Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Chief Privacy Officer Governance - Minnesota CDPA(5 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Chief-Privacy-Officer-Section-325O-06-MN-UNIQUE-Designation-Privacy-Programme-TrainingMinnesota CDPA Chief Privacy Officer + Section 325O.06 + MINNESOTA-UNIQUE Designation + Privacy Programme + Training5 targets
→171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
→171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
→171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
→171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
→171A-IR-02Assess Incident Response Testing

Universal Opt-Out Sensitive and Health Data - Minnesota CDPA(4 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Universal-Opt-Out-GPC-Sensitive-Data-Section-325O-02-Consumer-Health-Data-Children-Known-Child-TransgenderMinnesota CDPA Universal Opt-Out + GPC + Sensitive + Section 325O.02 + Consumer Health Data + Children + Known Child + Transgender4 targets
→171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
→171A-MP-01Assess Media Protection
→171A-SC-02Assess Cryptographic Protection
→171A-SC-03Assess Communications Protection

Related Comparisons

Other Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act comparisons

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act vs Turkey KVKK6 mappingsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)6 mappingsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act vs APPI6 mappingsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)6 mappingsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act vs Mauritius DPA6 mappingsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act vs Malaysia PDPA 20106 mappingsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act vs Mexico LFPDPPP6 mappingsMinnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)22 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)21 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsSLSA vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA, where 1 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.

How many controls map between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Of 8 total Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls, 2 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

6 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.