Cross-Framework Mapping

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy ActvsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)

See exactly how Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls map to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act maps to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chief Privacy Officer Governance - Minnesota CDPA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Data Privacy Assessment - Minnesota CDPA(3 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Data-Privacy-Assessment-DPIA-Section-325O-07-Sensitive-Targeted-Sale-Profiling-AI-Consumer-HealthMinnesota CDPA DPIA + Section 325O.07 + Sensitive + Targeted + Sale + Profiling + AI + Consumer Health3 targets
AT-DSG-10Section 29 - Liability and right to compensation / civil jurisdiction
AT-DSG-12Section 62 - Administrative penalties
AT-DSG-7Section 18 - Establishment of the Data Protection Authority

Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA(3 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Enforcement-AG-Ellison-Section-325O-10-USD-7500-Per-Violation-Data-Broker-Registration-325O-13-Sunset-25-Jan-2026Minnesota CDPA Enforcement + AG Ellison + Section 325O.10 + USD 7,500 Per Violation + Data Broker Registration + Sunset 25 January 20263 targets
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing

Processor Contract Security and Pseudonymisation - Minnesota CDPA(3 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Processor-Contract-Security-Section-325O-08-Pseudonymisation-Section-325O-09-De-IdentificationMinnesota CDPA Processor + Section 325O.08 + Security + Pseudonymisation + Section 325O.09 + De-Identification3 targets
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing

Related Comparisons

Other Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act has 8 controls across its framework, while Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chief Privacy Officer Governance - Minnesota CDPA, where 1 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

Of 8 total Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls, 3 map directly to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

5 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chief Privacy Officer Governance - Minnesota CDPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chief Privacy Officer Governance - Minnesota CDPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.