Cross-Framework Mapping

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy ActvsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Data Privacy Assessment - Minnesota CDPA(1 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Data-Privacy-Assessment-DPIA-Section-325O-07-Sensitive-Targeted-Sale-Profiling-AI-Consumer-HealthMinnesota CDPA DPIA + Section 325O.07 + Sensitive + Targeted + Sale + Profiling + AI + Consumer Health
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

Universal Opt-Out Sensitive and Health Data - Minnesota CDPA(1 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Universal-Opt-Out-GPC-Sensitive-Data-Section-325O-02-Consumer-Health-Data-Children-Known-Child-TransgenderMinnesota CDPA Universal Opt-Out + GPC + Sensitive + Section 325O.02 + Consumer Health Data + Children + Known Child + Transgender
9.1Risk communication and consultation

Related Comparisons

Other Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act has 8 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA, where 1 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 8 total Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls, 2 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

6 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.