TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MDS2 (Medical Device)vsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule

See exactly how MDS2 (Medical Device) controls map to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

43
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
46%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MDS2 (Medical Device) maps to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule with 46% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in MDS2 (Medical Device): Organizational Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

MDS2 (Medical Device): Patient Data Protection(10 mappings)

MDS2-01ePHI access controls and authorization4 targets
→314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(4)Information access management
→HIPAA-164.312(a)(1)Access control
MDS2-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit3 targets
→314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements
→314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
→NYDFS-500.15Encryption of Nonpublic Information
MDS2-05Audit trail for ePHI access3 targets
→314.4(c)(6)Data disposal procedures
→314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
→NYDFS-500.14Monitoring and Logging

MDS2 (Medical Device): Administrative Safeguards(8 mappings)

MDS2-06Security management process and risk analysis2 targets
→314.4(b)Written risk assessment
→314.4(d)Continuous monitoring and testing
MDS2-07Workforce security and clearance procedures
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(3)Workforce security
MDS2-08Information access management3 targets
→314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(4)Information access management
→HIPAA-164.312(a)(1)Access control
MDS2-09Security awareness and training program2 targets
→314.4(e)Security awareness training
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(5)Security awareness and training

MDS2 (Medical Device): Technical Safeguards(2 mappings)

MDS2-12Unique user identification and authentication2 targets
→314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
→HIPAA-164.308(a)(1)Security management process

+23 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other MDS2 (Medical Device) comparisons

MDS2 (Medical Device) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements10 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems10 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange10 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs HIPAA Security Rule10 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs ISO 1348510 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)10 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs ISO 2779910 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs FDA 21 CFR Part 1110 mappings

Other US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule21 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule21 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MDS2 (Medical Device) and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?

MDS2 (Medical Device) has 24 controls across its framework, while US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in MDS2 (Medical Device): Organizational Requirements, where 4 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls have no direct US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule equivalent.

How many controls map between MDS2 (Medical Device) and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?

Of 24 total MDS2 (Medical Device) controls, 11 map directly to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MDS2 (Medical Device) to US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?

13 MDS2 (Medical Device) controls have no direct equivalent in US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule. The highest concentration of gaps is in MDS2 (Medical Device): Organizational Requirements with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MDS2 (Medical Device) and US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule?

The domain with the highest gap count is MDS2 (Medical Device): Organizational Requirements (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.