Cross-Framework Mapping

Maryland Online Data Privacy ActvsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia)

See exactly how Maryland Online Data Privacy Act controls map to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

36
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act maps to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) with 29% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Maryland Online Data Privacy Act: Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 36 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act: Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

MD-ODPA-09Right to data portability
APA-09Right to data portability

Consent(1 mappings)

MD-ODPA-13Consent for Secondary Use
APA-13Encryption of personal data

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act: Data Security(7 mappings)

MD-ODPA-13Consent for Secondary Use
APA-13Encryption of personal data
MD-ODPA-15Attorney General Enforcement
APA-15Access control for personal data
MD-ODPA-16Consumer Health Data2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures
MD-ODPA-17De identified and Pseudonymous Data2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures
MD-ODPA-18Regular security testing and assessment
APA-18Regular security testing and assessment

Enforcement(1 mappings)

MD-ODPA-15Attorney General Enforcement
APA-15Access control for personal data

Sensitive data(2 mappings)

MD-ODPA-16Consumer Health Data2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures

Data handling(2 mappings)

MD-ODPA-17De identified and Pseudonymous Data2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act: Data Governance(6 mappings)

MD-ODPA-19Data protection officer designation6 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-19Data protection officer designation
APA-21Data protection impact assessments
APA-22Privacy by design and default

+16 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 768 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act has 38 controls across its framework, while Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Maryland Online Data Privacy Act: Data Subject Rights, where 6 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act controls have no direct Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Of 38 total Maryland Online Data Privacy Act controls, 15 map directly to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Maryland Online Data Privacy Act to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

31 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Maryland Online Data Privacy Act: Data Subject Rights with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Maryland Online Data Privacy Act: Data Subject Rights (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.