Cross-Framework Mapping

Virginia CDPAvsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia)

See exactly how Virginia CDPA controls map to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

31
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Virginia CDPA maps to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) with 52% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 Virginia CDPA controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Virginia CDPA: Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Virginia CDPA: Data Collection & Consent(9 mappings)

VA-CDPA-02Consent management and withdrawal3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
VA-CDPA-04Purpose limitation and specification3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
VA-CDPA-05Data minimization requirements3 targets
APA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
APA-16Data breach notification requirements

Virginia CDPA: Data Subject Rights(1 mappings)

VA-CDPA-09Right to data portability
APA-09Right to data portability

Virginia CDPA: Data Security(7 mappings)

VA-CDPA-13Encryption of personal data
APA-13Encryption of personal data
VA-CDPA-15Access control for personal data
APA-15Access control for personal data
VA-CDPA-16Data breach notification requirements2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures
VA-CDPA-17Security incident response procedures2 targets
APA-16Data breach notification requirements
APA-17Security incident response procedures
VA-CDPA-18Regular security testing and assessment
APA-18Regular security testing and assessment

Virginia CDPA: Data Governance(3 mappings)

VA-CDPA-19Data protection officer designation3 targets
APA-19Data protection officer designation
APA-21Data protection impact assessments
APA-22Privacy by design and default

+11 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Virginia CDPA and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Virginia CDPA has 29 controls across its framework, while Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Virginia CDPA: Data Subject Rights, where 6 Virginia CDPA controls have no direct Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between Virginia CDPA and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

Of 29 total Virginia CDPA controls, 15 map directly to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Virginia CDPA to Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

14 Virginia CDPA controls have no direct equivalent in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Virginia CDPA: Data Subject Rights with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Virginia CDPA and Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Virginia CDPA: Data Subject Rights (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.