TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for ExchangesvsFedRAMP Rev 5

See exactly how MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls map to FedRAMP Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

79
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
71%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges maps to FedRAMP Rev 5 with 71% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 79 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Controls(20 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue10 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→FEDRAMP-IR-1Incident Response Policy
→FEDRAMP-IR-6Incident Reporting
→FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
→FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access
→ICS-AC-1Role-based access control
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
→NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management4 targets
→FEDRAMP-IR-1Incident Response Policy
→FEDRAMP-IR-6Incident Reporting
→FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access
→FEDRAMP-RA-3Risk Assessment
KR-CSAP-SC-02Infrastructure and Network Security4 targets
→3.10Physical and Environmental Protection
→FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control
→FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access
→ICS-AC-4Physical access controls
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline2 targets
→FEDRAMP-PT-1PII Processing and Transparency Policy
→FEDRAMP-PT-3PII Minimization and Retention

+59 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges comparisons

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CSA CCM v415 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.014 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments14 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management14 mappings

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs FedRAMP Rev 537 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs FedRAMP Rev 535 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FedRAMP Rev 535 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FedRAMP Rev 533 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and FedRAMP Rev 5?

MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges has 21 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP Rev 5 covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (71% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 6 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls have no direct FedRAMP Rev 5 equivalent.

How many controls map between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and FedRAMP Rev 5?

Of 21 total MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls, 15 map directly to FedRAMP Rev 5 controls — representing 71% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges to FedRAMP Rev 5?

6 MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges and FedRAMP Rev 5?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.