TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Malaysia PDPA 2010vsISO 27799

See exactly how Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls map to ISO 27799. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Malaysia PDPA 2010 maps to ISO 27799 with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement Sanctions and Remedies - Malaysia PDPA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Cross-Border Transfer and Processor - Malaysia PDPA(3 mappings)

MY-PDPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Section-129-Whitelist-Abolition-2024-Adequacy-SCC-BCR-Processor-Direct-MarketingMalaysia PDPA Cross-Border + Section 129 + Whitelist Abolition 2024 + Adequacy + SCC + BCR + Processor + Marketing3 targets
→ISO27799-01ePHI access controls and authorization
→ISO27799-08Information access management
→ISO27799-17Facility access controls

Governance DPO Registration DPIA - Malaysia PDPA(4 mappings)

MY-PDPA-DPO-Designation-Class-Data-User-Registration-DPIA-Code-Practice-Section-43A-2024-AmendmentMalaysia PDPA Governance + DPO Section 43A + Class of Data User Registration + DPIA + Code of Practice4 targets
→ISO27799-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
→ISO27799-04Patient data de-identification procedures
→ISO27799-05Audit trail for ePHI access
→ISO27799-06Security management process and risk analysis

Sensitive Data and Children - Malaysia PDPA(2 mappings)

MY-PDPA-Sensitive-Personal-Data-Section-40-Health-Religious-Political-Sexual-Children-Explicit-ConsentMalaysia PDPA Sensitive Personal Data + Section 40 + Health + Religious + Political + Children + Explicit Consent2 targets
→ISO27799-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
→ISO27799-16Transmission security and encryption

Related Comparisons

Other Malaysia PDPA 2010 comparisons

Malaysia PDPA 2010 vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Montana Consumer Data Privacy Act7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Mexico LFPDPPP7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Mauritius DPA7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 20247 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Azure Security Benchmark7 mappingsMalaysia PDPA 2010 vs Bahrain PDPL7 mappings

Other ISO 27799 comparisons

NIST SP 800-66 vs ISO 2779912 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs ISO 2779912 mappingsMARS-E vs ISO 2779912 mappingsISO 13485 vs ISO 2779912 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs ISO 2779911 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ISO 2779911 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 2779910 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ISO 2779910 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and ISO 27799?

Malaysia PDPA 2010 has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 27799 covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement Sanctions and Remedies - Malaysia PDPA, where 1 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls have no direct ISO 27799 equivalent.

How many controls map between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and ISO 27799?

Of 8 total Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls, 3 map directly to ISO 27799 controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Malaysia PDPA 2010 to ISO 27799?

5 Malaysia PDPA 2010 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27799. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement Sanctions and Remedies - Malaysia PDPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Malaysia PDPA 2010 and ISO 27799?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement Sanctions and Remedies - Malaysia PDPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.