Cross-Framework Mapping

LGPDvsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how LGPD controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

LGPD maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 LGPD controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Enforcement + Sanctions + ANPD + 2% Turnover(1 mappings)

LGPD-BR-Enforcement-Sanctions-ANPD-Article-52-55-Administrative-Sanctions-2-Percent-Turnover-50M-BRLBrazil LGPD Enforcement + Sanctions + Article 52 + 2% Turnover + 50M BRL + ANPD
AWS-WA-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services

Governance + Encarregado + ROPA + DPIA + Articles 46-50(4 mappings)

LGPD-BR-Governance-Encarregado-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Privacy-by-Design-Article-46-50-Codes-of-ConductBrazil LGPD Governance + Encarregado (DPO) + ROPA + DPIA + Articles 46-504 targets
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
AWS-WA-15Secure data deletion in cloud

Security + Article 46 + Breach Article 48 + ANPD 3 days(2 mappings)

LGPD-BR-Security-Article-46-48-Breach-Notification-ANPD-Reasonable-Time-Incident-Response-CSIRTBrazil LGPD Security + Article 46-48 + Breach Notification + ANPD + Incident Response2 targets
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between LGPD and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

LGPD has 8 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD, where 1 LGPD controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between LGPD and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 8 total LGPD controls, 3 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping LGPD to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

5 LGPD controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between LGPD and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.