TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal DatavsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)

See exactly how Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls map to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

50
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data maps to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) with 33% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Accountability & Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 50 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Lawful Basis(4 mappings)

Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required4 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Part 1, Sec. 4Application and Scope
→SAPIN2-1Code of Conduct

Transparency(1 mappings)

Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception
→LAOS-CC-Art22LaoCERT

Supervisory Authority(2 mappings)

Art.19Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio Functions2 targets
→Art.26Production Orders
→Art.34Penalties for Legal Entities

Registry(2 mappings)

Art.25Preservation of Stored Data2 targets
→SAPIN2-2Corruption Risk Assessment
→SAPIN2-3Third-Party Due Diligence

International Transfers(1 mappings)

Art.26Production Orders
→Art.34Penalties for Legal Entities

Special Categories(8 mappings)

Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data4 targets
→Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
→Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data
→JOR-1Scope and Definitions (Article 1-2)
→PY-2Definitions
Art.7Children's Data4 targets
→Art.16Computer-Related Forgery and Fraud
→Art.28Real-Time Collection of Traffic Data
→JOR-1Scope and Definitions (Article 1-2)
→PY-2Definitions

Rights(2 mappings)

Art.8Rights of Data Subjects2 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions

+30 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs LGPD20 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs South Korea PIPA20 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Argentina PDPA19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs APPI19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Switzerland FADP19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Texas Data Privacy Act19 mappings

Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons

NIS2 Directive vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)18 mappingsDORA vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)17 mappingsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)17 mappingsUK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)17 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)17 mappingsLGPD vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)17 mappingsSwitzerland New Federal Act on Data Protection (nFADP/nDSG, 2023) vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)17 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 768 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data has 49 controls across its framework, while Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) covers 51 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Accountability & Compliance, where 5 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) equivalent.

How many controls map between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

Of 49 total Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls, 16 map directly to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

33 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). The highest concentration of gaps is in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Accountability & Compliance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Colombia Habeas Data Law: Accountability & Compliance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.