Cross-Framework Mapping

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)vsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
30%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 30% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

General Provisions(8 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
Art. 4Participating Institutions2 targets
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
JOR-1Scope and Definitions (Article 1–2)
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
PY-2Definitions
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
Part 1, Sec. 4Application and Scope2 targets
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Prevention Measures(8 mappings)

LAOS-CC-Art21Network Security
CSA-INF-02Infrastructure and Virtualization Security
LAOS-CC-Art22LaoCERT
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
SAPIN2-1Code of Conduct2 targets
CSA-INF-04Incident Management
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
SAPIN2-2Corruption Risk Assessment2 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
SAPIN2-3Third-Party Due Diligence2 targets
AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design

Related Comparisons

Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) has 33 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General Provisions, where 13 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 33 total Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls, 10 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

23 Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in General Provisions with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is General Provisions (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.